Recent News Pilot FatigueInformation provided by ALPA

Preventing Pilot Fatigue
Information provided by ALPA's Flight Time/Duty Time Committee

Menu
Home
Recent News
Principles
8 hours max flying
12 hours max on duty
10 hours min rest
Fundamental Principles
FT/DT Guide (vers. 6)
New! JEPPESEN FORMAT
Fatigue Resources
Batelle Report
ALPA NPRM 95-18 Comment
Fatigue, Alcohol and Performance
NASA TM
Additional Resources
ALPA News Releases
Air Line Pilot Magazine
FAA Interpretations
Reserve Rest
  - Reserve Rest Q & A
FAR Max Duty Day
ATA v. FAA
    (Opinion of Court)
FAA Correspondence
Questions? Comments?
ALPA Home Page

 

8 Hours Max Flying

The most offensive and least justifiable portion of NPRM 95-18 (Notice of Proposed Rule Making) is the increase beyond 8 hours in the flight-time limitation for all domestic and international two-pilot crews. 

ALPA is adamantly opposed to any flight-time increase beyond 8 hours. 

The purpose of this rulemaking is to address the problem of pilot fatigue, and it makes no sense whatsoever to address that problem by dramatically increasing the amount of time pilots may spend in flight without a rest. Were the effects not so dramatic, the proposal would be comic: like a plan to catch up on lost sleep by staying up later, or a plan to lose weight by eating more chocolate.

The FAA contends that its proposal is consistent with the NASA TM (Technical Memorandum), but there is no basis for that claim. While the NASA researchers did recommend that the "cumulative flight duty period not exceed 10 hours within a 24-hour period," the "flight duty period" they were referring to included all periods from the time the pilot first reports for a duty period until the end of the final flight segment -- essentially the same definition proposed by the FAA for its concept of duty period.  

In other words, when the NASA researchers referred to a 10-hour flight duty period, they were referring not to flight time, but to what the FAA has designated as duty time. Accordingly, to the extent that the NASA TM speaks to the issue of flight time limitations, it may justify a decrease, but not an increase

It is also important to consider that all the responsible government agencies (Congress, NASA, the FAA, and the NTSB) have agreed that pilot fatigue exists and that the current regulations need revision to insure that pilots do not fly when fatigued. By proposing to increase the hard flight time beyond the current eight hours, the FAA is increasing, not reducing, the fatigue potential for pilots. There is absolutely no scientific rationale or industry experience that would justify any increase in the hard flight time from the current eight hours.

Fatigue has been attributed to accidents and incidents in other industries as well. The following outlines the odds ratios for an accident relative to time on duty. This slide is taken from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's Research Findings on Driving Hours and Work Hours. The complete presentation is available by clicking here.  

Chart:  Odds Ratios for Crashing by Driving Hours,  Controlling for Time of Day